<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Apache-Tools on BAFM</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/tags/apache-tools/</link><description>Recent content in Apache-Tools on BAFM</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.160.1</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 16:04:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/tags/apache-tools/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Progress with apache-2-2</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/posts/2007-05-28_progress-with-apache-2-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 16:04:10 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.barfoo.org/phreak/2007/05/28/progress-with-apache-22/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We&amp;rsquo;re finally making some progress with apache-2.2. It left the package.mask on the 8th of May (that&amp;rsquo;s like 3 weeks from tomorrow), we split some helper scripts into a separate package (app-admin/apache-tools).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I already fixed a few screwup I did myself (like apxs missing from either apache and apache-tools, or the compatibility symlinks being missing), so we &amp;ldquo;just&amp;rdquo; need to fix all the modules in the tree before apache-2.2 is going to get the new stable version (and of course anything else depending on. What also remains to do, is committing the new-style virtuals for bug 11007.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>