<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Apache on BAFM</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/tags/apache/</link><description>Recent content in Apache on BAFM</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.160.1</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 12:30:38 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/tags/apache/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ViMbAdmin and mod_rewrite</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/posts/2014-12-02_vimbadmin-and-mod-rewrite/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 12:30:38 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://christian.weblog.heimdaheim.de/?p=5380</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I use ViMbAdmin for the mail box administration of my users (and aliases) on heimdaheim.de. After I while (well, over half a year I guess), I decided to look at it again. However it didn&amp;rsquo;t work. Well this was a multi-part problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;ViMbAdmin has been updated to require PHP composer (which populates the vendor/ folder)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;the application.ini was outdated&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After I fixed all that, ViMbAdmin was working again. However I decided to replace my mod_rewrite stuff (I had in my apache config from the previous version) with the one from the Documentation and that actually made things worse. So I ended up &lt;em&gt;redigging&lt;/em&gt; into mod_rewrite (again &lt;em&gt;sigh&lt;/em&gt;) and rewrite the Rewrite Rules&amp;hellip; This time I&amp;rsquo;m documenting it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Subversion via HTTP(s) and mod_rewrite</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/posts/2008-09-28_subversion-via-http-s-and-mod-rewrite/</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:17:01 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barfoo.org/?p=991</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I just finished my wild-goose chase with Apache and subversion regarding a rather weird error. I recently reinstalled our subversion box, and ever since then I was unable to commit anything new to any of the repositories.
Subversion told me this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="highlight"&gt;&lt;div class="chroma"&gt;
&lt;table class="lntable"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="lntd"&gt;
&lt;pre tabindex="0" class="chroma"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;span class="lnt" id="hl-0-1"&gt;&lt;a class="lnlinks" href="#hl-0-1"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lnt" id="hl-0-2"&gt;&lt;a class="lnlinks" href="#hl-0-2"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lnt" id="hl-0-3"&gt;&lt;a class="lnlinks" href="#hl-0-3"&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td class="lntd"&gt;
&lt;pre tabindex="0" class="chroma"&gt;&lt;code class="language-fallback" data-lang="fallback"&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;svn-client admin-scripts [1] &amp;gt; svn ci -m &amp;#34;Directories for Tivoli Storage Manager Scripts.&amp;#34;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;svn: Commit failed (details follow):
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="line"&gt;&lt;span class="cl"&gt;svn: MKACTIVITY of &amp;#39;/svn/admin-scripts/!svn/act/someid&amp;#39;: 302 Found
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apache didn&amp;rsquo;t say much about it either, besides this particular line:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>subversion on WebDAV with Active Directory authorization on SLES10</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/posts/2008-06-29_subversion-on-webdav-with-active-directory-authorization-on-sles10/</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:49:29 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barfoo.org/?p=425</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, so I ended up toying with subversion via WebDAV on SLES today (I know, I know .. it&amp;rsquo;s bloody Sunday). It wasn&amp;rsquo;t much of a hassle though, after reading this. Sure, I made a few errors at first (simply confused the logic behind &amp;quot; &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#location"&gt;Location&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot; and &amp;quot; &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#directory"&gt;Directory&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot;), but after that plain subversion commits via WebDAV (thus utilizing Apache) worked fine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For POC or as a hint to myself, here&amp;rsquo;s where and what I needed to add/change:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Progress with apache-2-2</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/posts/2007-05-28_progress-with-apache-2-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 16:04:10 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.barfoo.org/phreak/2007/05/28/progress-with-apache-22/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We&amp;rsquo;re finally making some progress with apache-2.2. It left the package.mask on the 8th of May (that&amp;rsquo;s like 3 weeks from tomorrow), we split some helper scripts into a separate package (app-admin/apache-tools).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I already fixed a few screwup I did myself (like apxs missing from either apache and apache-tools, or the compatibility symlinks being missing), so we &amp;ldquo;just&amp;rdquo; need to fix all the modules in the tree before apache-2.2 is going to get the new stable version (and of course anything else depending on. What also remains to do, is committing the new-style virtuals for bug 11007.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SLES-9 (once again)</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/posts/2007-03-08_sles-9-once-again/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:55:36 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.barfoo.org/phreak/2007/03/08/sles-9-once-again/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, so today was the highlight of the week &amp;hellip; We updated apache2 on Tuesday (yeah, that&amp;rsquo;s still 2.0.49, so if you have some exploits - try them &amp;#x1f61b; ) and now out of the sudden we have major performance issues. We looked nearly the whole forenoon for a reason, &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;why&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; the frackin&amp;rsquo; apache was using 236% of the CPU&amp;rsquo;s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the afternoon, when my co-worker decided to go home (that was ~1500), I decided to revert back to the old patch level. But that isn&amp;rsquo;t as easy as you think (at least on SLES). The only thing I wanted to do, was something like this:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>