Load-Balancing on BAFM

Adapter teaming on SLES10

Sat, 16 Aug 2014 10:18:13 +0000

Since one of the requirements for my current project is having NIC redundancy, I didn’t get around looking at the available " adapter teaming" (or adapter bonding) solutions available for Linux/SLES.

First I tried to dig into the Broadcom solution (since the Blade I first implemented the stuff uses a Broadcom NetXtreme II card) , but found out pretty soon that the basp configuration tool, which is only available on the Broadcom driver CD’s shipped with the Blade itself, pretty much doesn’t work.

PacketPro 1-7-0

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:37:41 +0000

After blogging the last time about the PacketPro 450 LoadBalancer appliance, the guys over at teamix seem to have taken that to heart and implemented a rather nifty thing for their new release.

It’s called " Port forwarding", which is basically what you’d figure from the name. It bounces ports around the load balancer, but saves you from creating a separate virtual server (and adding the physical servers to that one), but also saves you from modifying the syslog-ng configuration on the balanced servers.

TYPO3 and MySQL replication

Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:33:13 +0000

Apparently the TYPO3 version we are using, doesn’t play too nice with the MySQL MasterMaster replication.

Sometimes, something like this is going to happen:

1
2


070826 0:44:32 [ERROR] Slave: Error 'Duplicate entry '75-222419149' for key 1' on query. Default database: 't3nb'. Query: 'INSERT INTO cache_pagesection
070826 0:44:32 [ERROR] Error running query, slave SQL thread aborted. Fix the problem, and restart the slave SQL thread with "SLAVE START". We stopped at log 'dbc-mysql1.000192' position 611861372

Well, as you can see from the last line in the log, the Slave-SQL thread found a duplicate entry and thought it is smart to just turn off the thread instead of disregarding the just made entry. So from now on, both databases drift since there ain’t no replication anymore until someone kick starts the replication again (someone being me).

miimon, arp_interval and the code

Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:50:14 +0000

After today’s adventure with the kernel bonding, I just took a look at the code …

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


 if (miimon) {
 printk(KERN_INFO DRV_NAME
 ": MII link monitoring set to %d msn",
 miimon);
 } else if (arp_interval) {
 int i;

 printk(KERN_INFO DRV_NAME
 ": ARP monitoring set to %d ms, validate %s, with %d target(s):",
 arp_interval,
 arp_validate_tbl[arp_validate_value].modename,
 arp_ip_count);

 for (i = 0; i < arp_ip_count; i++)
 printk (" %s", arp_ip_target[i]);

 printk("n");

 } else {
 /* miimon and arp_interval not set, we need one so things
 * work as expected, see bonding.txt for details
 */
 printk(KERN_WARNING DRV_NAME
 ": Warning: either miimon or arp_interval and "
 "arp_ip_target module parameters must be specified, "
 "otherwise bonding will not detect link failures! see "
 "bonding.txt for details.n");
 }

If I read it right, you only get the KERN_WARNING for “either miimon or arp_interval” only if miimon or arp_interval isn’t set … but at least my config says it is .. 🤷 .. bed time for me :rolling_eyes: