<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Resource-Agent on BAFM</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/tags/resource-agent/</link><description>Recent content in Resource-Agent on BAFM</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.160.1</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 09:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/tags/resource-agent/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Linux-HA and Tivoli Storage Manager</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/posts/2014-08-08_linux-ha-and-tivoli-storage-manager/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 09:44:38 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barfoo.org/?p=983</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, since we received part of our shipment on Wednesday, I finally looked at how we&amp;rsquo;re gonna deploy our active/active Tivoli Storage Manager configuration. Right now, we do have a single pSeries box hosting ~100 client nodes which we&amp;rsquo;re looking to split by two (since we do have two x366 for that purpose now).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, as there ain&amp;rsquo;t no solution for this scenario yet (neither from International Business Machines nor someone out of the open source community), I sat down and started writing an OCF Resource agent for dsmserv (that is the Tivoli Storage Manager server).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Linux-HA and Tivoli Storage Manager (Finito!)</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/posts/2014-08-08_linux-ha-and-tivoli-storage-manager-finito/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 08:59:07 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barfoo.org/?p=1047</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I previously said, I was writing &lt;a href="http://christian.weblog.heimdaheim.de/2008/09/26/linux-ha-and-tivoli-storage-manager/" title="Linux-HA and Tivoli Storage Manager"&gt;my own OCF resource agent&lt;/a&gt; for IBM&amp;rsquo;s Tivoli Storage Manager Server. And I just finished it yesterday evening (it took me about two hours to write this post).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only took me about four work days (that is roughly four hours each, which weren&amp;rsquo;t recorded in that subversion repository) plus most of this week at home (which is 10 hours a day) and about one hundred subversion revisions. The good part about it is, that it actually just works :-D (I was amazed on how good actually). Now you&amp;rsquo;re gonna say, &amp;ldquo;but Christian, why didn&amp;rsquo;t you use the included Init-Script and just fix it up, so it is actually compilant to the LSB Standard ?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The answer is rather simple: Yeah I could have done that, but you also know that wouldn&amp;rsquo;t have been fun. Life is all about learning, and learn something I did (even if I hit the head against the wall from time to time ;-) during those few days) &amp;hellip; There&amp;rsquo;s still one or two things I might want to add/change in the future (that is maybe next week), like&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;adding support for monitor depth by querying the dsmserv instance via dsmadmc (if you read through the resource agent, I already use it for the shutdown/pre-shutdown stuff)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I still have to properly test it (like Alan Robertson mentioned in his &lt;a href="http://lca2007.linux.org.au/talk/29.html"&gt;one hour thirty talk on Linux-HA 2.0&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/opensource_training/heartbeat"&gt;on his slides&lt;/a&gt;, Page 100-102) in a pre-production environment&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m probably configure the IBM RSA to act as a stonith device ( &lt;strong&gt;s&lt;/strong&gt; hoot &lt;strong&gt;t&lt;/strong&gt; he &lt;strong&gt;o&lt;/strong&gt; ther &lt;strong&gt;n&lt;/strong&gt; ode &lt;strong&gt;i&lt;/strong&gt; n &lt;strong&gt;t&lt;/strong&gt; he &lt;strong&gt;h&lt;/strong&gt; ead) - just for the case one of them ever gets stuck in a case, where the box is still up, but doesn&amp;rsquo;t react to any requests anymore&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>