<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>San on BAFM</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/tags/san/</link><description>Recent content in San on BAFM</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.160.1</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/tags/san/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>SLES10 on pSeries</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/posts/2007-07-04_sles10-on-pseries/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:58:39 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barfoo.org/2007/07/04/sles10-on-pseries/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, yet another day passed by blazing fast. I had a good day at work, spent nearly the whole day trying to get my bloody systems hooked up to our SAN (which was interrupted by a non-working SAN-switch, disappearing WWN&amp;rsquo;s, lunch and my trainees), messing around with our internal network, hacking our Blade Chassis switches to get me what I want and some random paperwork.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But first things first .. We installed SLES10 on a pSeries box the other day (I think on Monday), and now I&amp;rsquo;m trying to get the &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;WWN&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; of it&amp;rsquo;s &lt;strong&gt;Emulex HBA&lt;/strong&gt;, out of either sysfs or procfs. But whatcha&amp;rsquo; thinking ?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Waiting</title><link>https://christian.blog.pakiheim.de/posts/2007-02-28_waiting/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:58:05 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.barfoo.org/phreak/2007/03/06/waiting/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are still waiting for the money promised by the state and the country for our HBFG (again, it&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;Hochschulbauförderungsgesetz&amp;rdquo;), that hopefully is reducing or eliminating our storage/SAN problem we have currently. Right now we have to Cisco MDS9216 (that&amp;rsquo;s a 16-port 2GBps SAN-switch, two for redundancy), which means we only have 16 SAN-ports. That isn&amp;rsquo;t much, but still is to less, as we have like 30 machines or so, that &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;really&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; need access to the SAN, so we either end up unplugging some of them from the SAN or merge them onto some big machines (like our x366).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>